ruff ruff......down boy....
both you and Wil should let it alone.........
i know whats going on......but that doesnt mean i have to post it....
Wil......across the street (the other street) i posted my thoughts on you....
let kodiak do the bashing he is doing a fine job....
bashing is really not your style.............seriously
General......just using your thread to relay this message..thnks
both you and Wil should let it alone.........
i know whats going on......but that doesnt mean i have to post it....
Wil......across the street (the other street) i posted my thoughts on you....
let kodiak do the bashing he is doing a fine job....
bashing is really not your style.............seriously
General......just using your thread to relay this message..thnks
No offense but if a line is available & the player bets it & posts it, does he have to hold their hand & guide them through the process of wagering on it if they so choose too?
There are hundreds of books out there & you can find a bunch of differences in line if you put in the hard work to do so, why can't people be responsible & do the same due dilligence?
There are hundreds of books out there & you can find a bunch of differences in line if you put in the hard work to do so, why can't people be responsible & do the same due dilligence?
Just for the record I have not discussed any of this (now getting very old) business with General. He made this thread on his own - true story.
Dime - sounds like I got my name in the paper at OGD, which is no surprise. I don't visit the site but do appreciate you posting here. Thanks.
As far as whatever Raiders posted wherever he posted it - I can only say more power to him. Knock yourself out Raiders. Maybe you can get CNN to pick up the story of how you have been accused so unjustly of using stale numbers. I doubt you will do it again - lesson learned.
wil.
Dime - sounds like I got my name in the paper at OGD, which is no surprise. I don't visit the site but do appreciate you posting here. Thanks.
As far as whatever Raiders posted wherever he posted it - I can only say more power to him. Knock yourself out Raiders. Maybe you can get CNN to pick up the story of how you have been accused so unjustly of using stale numbers. I doubt you will do it again - lesson learned.
wil.
General- Why would you post that in the RR. Stale lines are being posted in the sports forums not by me. If you want to place a wager for a dime that I made the bets lets do it. I'm tired of you guys accusing me directly or indirectly of using stale lines.
EGD said it perfectly. I made the play and then posted it. It's not my job to hold the posters hand.
EGD said it perfectly. I made the play and then posted it. It's not my job to hold the posters hand.
I told you I did in a confidential EM to you (obviously confidential means nothing to you) or did you forget. So now tell me where I lied. I know you are trying desparately to turn this into something it is not. You made the post with the lines, I simply said they looked like a wish list. Now tell me what lie I told. This is about your thread from yesterday not some issue from 3 months ago. Again where have I lied? You seem to like to make accusations about people lieing so now back them up.
It's obvious that you still hold a grudge. There are tons of posters that used stale lines and yet you jumped on none of them. You even thanked one for a great day. I used no stale lines and yet you felt the need to jump in my thread and accuse me of using stale lines. You tell me why?
I said nothing about you banning me wrongly about a RR post until this time. The only reason I bring it up now is because you are still going out of your way looking for trouble.
I didn't start this even though I had reason too for the banning of a RR post.
I said nothing about you banning me wrongly about a RR post until this time. The only reason I bring it up now is because you are still going out of your way looking for trouble.
I didn't start this even though I had reason too for the banning of a RR post.
NOBODY CARES Raiders... You problem is you think your something your not..
NOBODY CARES ABOUT YOU KID.. YOUR STALE NUMBERS / YOUR SQUARE PLAYS / YOUR CHILDISH BEHAVIOR.... NOBODY CARES.... SHUT OFF THE COMPUTER AND WALK AWAY..... Your in a fantasy world were you think people actually care about what you say or do... NOBODY DOES!!!!!!!!
get a grip!!!!!
:drink:
NOBODY CARES ABOUT YOU KID.. YOUR STALE NUMBERS / YOUR SQUARE PLAYS / YOUR CHILDISH BEHAVIOR.... NOBODY CARES.... SHUT OFF THE COMPUTER AND WALK AWAY..... Your in a fantasy world were you think people actually care about what you say or do... NOBODY DOES!!!!!!!!
get a grip!!!!!
:drink:
Take a look at the Stardust line moves on your plays and you can see why I said they look like wish list plays:
Giants +7.5 Closed plus 7
Buf +6 " " 4.5
Ari +3.5 " " 3
Mia +7 " " 4.5
TB +3.5 " " 3
Oak -2 " " -3
Chi +11 " " 9.5
Jags +4.5 " " 3.5
I mean if they were even close I would have never mentioned it. This has nothing to do with you personally, it was just a thread that caught my attention becasue of the disparity of the numbers you posted. Simple as that.
Stardust
Time Visitor Line Home Total
10/3/04 1:00:00 PM ET Ny Giants +7 Green Bay 45
9/27/04 11:00:00 AM ET Ny Giants +7 Green Bay 44
9/26/04 9:00:00 PM ET Ny Giants NL Green Bay NL
10/3/04 1:00:00 PM ET New England -4.5 Buffalo 35
10/3/04 12:00:00 PM ET New England -5.5 Buffalo 35
10/3/04 11:00:00 AM ET New England -6 Buffalo 35
9/26/04 9:00:00 PM ET New England -5.5 Buffalo 35
10/3/04 12:00:00 PM ET New Orleans -3 Arizona 40
9/30/04 12:00:00 PM ET New Orleans -3.5 Arizona 40
9/27/04 7:00:00 PM ET New Orleans -4 Arizona 40
9/26/04 9:00:00 PM ET New Orleans -4 Arizona 41
10/3/04 5:00:00 PM ET Denver -3 Tampa Bay 34.5
9/28/04 3:00:00 PM ET Denver -3 Tampa Bay 35
9/27/04 11:00:00 AM ET Denver -3 Tampa Bay 36
9/26/04 9:00:00 PM ET Denver NL Tampa Bay NL
10/3/04 1:00:00 PM ET Oakland -2.5 Houston 44.5
10/3/04 11:00:00 AM ET Oakland -2.5 Houston 44
10/2/04 4:00:00 PM ET Oakland -2.5 Houston 43
9/28/04 5:00:00 PM ET Oakland -2.5 Houston 42
9/27/04 12:00:00 PM ET Oakland -1.5 Houston 42
9/27/04 11:00:00 AM ET Oakland PK Houston 42
9/26/04 9:00:00 PM ET Oakland NL Houston NL
10/3/04 1:00:00 PM ET Philadelphia -9.5 Chicago 40
10/3/04 11:00:00 AM ET Philadelphia -9.5 Chicago 39
10/2/04 5:00:00 PM ET Philadelphia -8.5 Chicago 39
10/2/04 4:00:00 PM ET Philadelphia -9 Chicago 39
10/1/04 12:00:00 PM ET Philadelphia -8.5 Chicago 39
9/27/04 7:00:00 PM ET Philadelphia -8.5 Chicago 40
9/27/04 11:00:00 AM ET Philadelphia -8.5 Chicago 41
9/26/04 9:00:00 PM ET Philadelphia NL Chicago NL
10/3/04 1:00:00 PM ET Indianapolis -3.5 Jacksonville 43
10/3/04 11:00:00 AM ET Indianapolis -4 Jacksonville 43
9/30/04 12:00:00 PM ET Indianapolis -4 Jacksonville 42.5
9/27/04 11:00:00 AM ET Indianapolis -4 Jacksonville 42
9/26/04 9:00:00 PM ET Indianapolis -4.5 Jacksonville 42
Giants +7.5 Closed plus 7
Buf +6 " " 4.5
Ari +3.5 " " 3
Mia +7 " " 4.5
TB +3.5 " " 3
Oak -2 " " -3
Chi +11 " " 9.5
Jags +4.5 " " 3.5
I mean if they were even close I would have never mentioned it. This has nothing to do with you personally, it was just a thread that caught my attention becasue of the disparity of the numbers you posted. Simple as that.
Stardust
Time Visitor Line Home Total
10/3/04 1:00:00 PM ET Ny Giants +7 Green Bay 45
9/27/04 11:00:00 AM ET Ny Giants +7 Green Bay 44
9/26/04 9:00:00 PM ET Ny Giants NL Green Bay NL
10/3/04 1:00:00 PM ET New England -4.5 Buffalo 35
10/3/04 12:00:00 PM ET New England -5.5 Buffalo 35
10/3/04 11:00:00 AM ET New England -6 Buffalo 35
9/26/04 9:00:00 PM ET New England -5.5 Buffalo 35
10/3/04 12:00:00 PM ET New Orleans -3 Arizona 40
9/30/04 12:00:00 PM ET New Orleans -3.5 Arizona 40
9/27/04 7:00:00 PM ET New Orleans -4 Arizona 40
9/26/04 9:00:00 PM ET New Orleans -4 Arizona 41
10/3/04 5:00:00 PM ET Denver -3 Tampa Bay 34.5
9/28/04 3:00:00 PM ET Denver -3 Tampa Bay 35
9/27/04 11:00:00 AM ET Denver -3 Tampa Bay 36
9/26/04 9:00:00 PM ET Denver NL Tampa Bay NL
10/3/04 1:00:00 PM ET Oakland -2.5 Houston 44.5
10/3/04 11:00:00 AM ET Oakland -2.5 Houston 44
10/2/04 4:00:00 PM ET Oakland -2.5 Houston 43
9/28/04 5:00:00 PM ET Oakland -2.5 Houston 42
9/27/04 12:00:00 PM ET Oakland -1.5 Houston 42
9/27/04 11:00:00 AM ET Oakland PK Houston 42
9/26/04 9:00:00 PM ET Oakland NL Houston NL
10/3/04 1:00:00 PM ET Philadelphia -9.5 Chicago 40
10/3/04 11:00:00 AM ET Philadelphia -9.5 Chicago 39
10/2/04 5:00:00 PM ET Philadelphia -8.5 Chicago 39
10/2/04 4:00:00 PM ET Philadelphia -9 Chicago 39
10/1/04 12:00:00 PM ET Philadelphia -8.5 Chicago 39
9/27/04 7:00:00 PM ET Philadelphia -8.5 Chicago 40
9/27/04 11:00:00 AM ET Philadelphia -8.5 Chicago 41
9/26/04 9:00:00 PM ET Philadelphia NL Chicago NL
10/3/04 1:00:00 PM ET Indianapolis -3.5 Jacksonville 43
10/3/04 11:00:00 AM ET Indianapolis -4 Jacksonville 43
9/30/04 12:00:00 PM ET Indianapolis -4 Jacksonville 42.5
9/27/04 11:00:00 AM ET Indianapolis -4 Jacksonville 42
9/26/04 9:00:00 PM ET Indianapolis -4.5 Jacksonville 42
Just in case you think I don't hold myself to the same standard
Posted: 09-27-2004, 06:38 PM
Jets at Dolphins
<HR style="COLOR: #fdde82" SIZE=1><!-- / icon and title --><!-- message -->Just a heads up for anyone thinking of playing the Jets this week. IMHO would not be surprised to see this line move towards 6 as the weeks moves on. Jets bettors might be well advised to bet early for best number.
Just an opinion on line movement, I could be wrong, but it would not shock me to see game close 6.
GL, wil.
Posted 09-28-2004, 10:04 PM :
227 Jets -6 -111 -259 OVER 36.5 -110
228 Dolphins +6 +101 +239 UNDER 36.5 +100 (Pinnacle)
That didn't take long. I hope some of you Jets guys laid the 5 or even 5.5.
I would like to use this as a play on Sunday but it would be unfair with my number gone.
Best of luck, wil.
http://forum.therx.com/showthread.php?t=229330&highlight=jets
<!-- / message -->
<!-- / message --><!-- / status icon and date -->
Posted: 09-27-2004, 06:38 PM
Jets at Dolphins
<HR style="COLOR: #fdde82" SIZE=1><!-- / icon and title --><!-- message -->Just a heads up for anyone thinking of playing the Jets this week. IMHO would not be surprised to see this line move towards 6 as the weeks moves on. Jets bettors might be well advised to bet early for best number.
Just an opinion on line movement, I could be wrong, but it would not shock me to see game close 6.
GL, wil.
Posted 09-28-2004, 10:04 PM :
227 Jets -6 -111 -259 OVER 36.5 -110
228 Dolphins +6 +101 +239 UNDER 36.5 +100 (Pinnacle)
That didn't take long. I hope some of you Jets guys laid the 5 or even 5.5.
I would like to use this as a play on Sunday but it would be unfair with my number gone.
Best of luck, wil.
http://forum.therx.com/showthread.php?t=229330&highlight=jets
<!-- / message -->
<!-- / message --><!-- / status icon and date -->
Ravens post made early for same reason
<TABLE class=tborder cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=thead style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal">10-03-2004, 12:32 AM <!-- / status icon and date --></TD><TD class=thead style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal" align=right> #1 </TD></TR><TR vAlign=top><TD class=alt2 width=175>wilheim<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_1535438", true); </SCRIPT>
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 18,713
</TD><TD class=alt1><!-- icon and title -->
MONDAY October 3rd. Play
<HR style="COLOR: #fdde82" SIZE=1><!-- / icon and title --><!-- message -->I am posting now because of possible line movement. I am playing the Ravens -5.5 -110 at Grande. I do not want to lay 6 which is the number I see this game moving to at least.
Play on Baltimore Ravens -5.5 -110 (Bet Grande).
YTD:
5-3-1 Plus 3.18 units (includes a 2 unit play and plus $$$ ML play).
Best of luck to all. wil.
<!-- / message --></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE class=tborder cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=thead style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal">10-03-2004, 12:32 AM <!-- / status icon and date --></TD><TD class=thead style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal" align=right> #1 </TD></TR><TR vAlign=top><TD class=alt2 width=175>wilheim<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_1535438", true); </SCRIPT>
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 18,713
</TD><TD class=alt1><!-- icon and title -->
<HR style="COLOR: #fdde82" SIZE=1><!-- / icon and title --><!-- message -->I am posting now because of possible line movement. I am playing the Ravens -5.5 -110 at Grande. I do not want to lay 6 which is the number I see this game moving to at least.
Play on Baltimore Ravens -5.5 -110 (Bet Grande).
YTD:
5-3-1 Plus 3.18 units (includes a 2 unit play and plus $$$ ML play).
Best of luck to all. wil.
<!-- / message --></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
